Under the “publish or perish” mantra and the race for grants, insights to catalyze research into wood science

Authors

  • Antoine Harfouche DIBAF - Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems, University of Tuscia
  • Manuela Romagnoli DIBAF - Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems, University of Tuscia
  • Piermaria Corona CREA - Research Centre for Forestry and Wood

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12899/asr-2407

Keywords:

Wood Science, High-Quality Research, Innovative Research, Open Science, Grant Funding, Sustainable Development, Ethics

Abstract

The quality of research is the lifeline to get a good wood science, as science generally; embracing a ‘publish but don’t perish’ stance might be a valuable insight to stride this science forward. A focus on quality rather than quantity of published material would greatly reinvigorate our science and entrepreneurial capabilities, ensure continued public trust in the academic enterprise, address the needs and expectations of the 21st-century society, and help to secure a truly sustainable future, one that responsibly maintains the well-being of nature and people. Stimulating wood-based innovation certainly develops a fundamental niche in such sustainable future fitting the main goals of the sustainable development.

References

Buntgen U., Krusic P.J., Di Cosmo N. 2021 - Science in silence. Erkunde 75: 61-63. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2021.01.05.

Corona P. 2021 - Taking the right care of scientometric indicators will take care of research quality. Annals of Silvicultural Research 46: 97-98. https://doi.org/10.12899/asr-2291

German D., Geman S. 2016 - Science in the age of selfies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 9384-9387. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609793113.

Gibney E. 2022 - Could machine learning fuel a reproducibility crisis in science? Nature 608: 250-251. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-02035-w.

Kittur A., Yu L., Hope T., Chan J., Lifshitz-Assaf H., Gilon K., Ng F., Kraut R. E., Shahaf D. 2019 - Scaling up analogical innovation with crowds and AI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116: 1870-1877. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807185116.

Manfriani C. Gualdani G., Goli G., Carlson B., Certo A.R., Mazzanti P., Fioravanti M. 2021 - The contribution of IoT to the implementation of preventive conservation according to European standards: the case study of the “cannone” violin and its historical copy. Sustainability 4: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041900

Nakhle F., Harfouche A.L. 2021 - Ready, steady, go AI: A practical tutorial on fundamentals of artificial intelligence and its applications in phenomics image analysis. Patterns 2: 100323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100323.

Nature Editorial 2022 - Research evaluation needs to change with the times. Nature 601 : 166. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00056-z

Ness R. 2015 - The creativity crisis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Parkes E. 2019 - Scientific progress is built on failure. Nature 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00107-y

Podor Z., Gludovátz A., Bacsárdi L., Erdei I., Janky F.N. 2017 - Industrial IoT techniques and solutions in wood industrial manufactures. Infocommunication Journal 4: 24-30.

Tamantini S., Lungo A.D., Romagnoli M., Paletto A., Keller M., Bersier, J., Zikeli, F. 2021 - Basic steps to promote biorefinery value chains in forestry in Italy. Sustainability 13(21): 11731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111731

Downloads

Published

2022-12-19

How to Cite

Harfouche, A., Romagnoli, M., & Corona, P. (2022). Under the “publish or perish” mantra and the race for grants, insights to catalyze research into wood science. Annals of Silvicultural Research, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.12899/asr-2407

Issue

Section

Concept notes

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.